(PC) Medina v. Superior Court of California, County of Santa Barbara

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN C. MEDINA, Case No. 1:20-cv-0636 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL,

v. DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, ET

AL., (Doc. 15) Defendants.

17 The assigned magistrate judge reviewed the allegations of Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Doc. 13.) The magistrate judge found that it appeared Plaintiff raised many unrelated claims, which concerning both his conditions of confinement and the legality of his confinement. (Id. at 4-8.) The magistrate judge determined Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and “[t]o the extent Plaintiff seeks to challenge the legality or duration of his confinement it is not appropriate to do so in a Section 1983 action.” (See id.; see…