Bluebond

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA D. PADILLA, No. 2:23-cv-0236 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HON. SHERI BLUEBOND, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Maria D. Padilla is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) The complaint alleges that plaintiff’s rights were violated as the result of “an erroneous court order” issued by the defendant. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 1.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s…