Walters

(PC) Thomas v. Walters

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20232:18-cv-01711California2,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLIFFORD BRENT THOMAS, No. 2:18-CV-1711-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. HOLMES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions to compel Defendants to produce surveillance footage he requested in discovery. See ECF Nos. 62, 63 and 66. The purpose of discovery is to “remove surprise from trial preparation so the parties can obtain evidence necessary to evaluate and resolve their dispute.” United States v. Chapman Univ., 245 F.R.D. 646, 648 (C.D. Cal. 2007) (quotation and citation omitted). Federal Rules of Civil Procedure offers guidance on the scope of discovery permitted: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged information that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.