Bobbla
(PC) Davis v. Bobbla
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, AKA No. 2:22-cv-1658 TLN DB P
MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS-ROGERS,
11 Plaintiff, ORDER v.
MANJALA BOBBLA,
14 Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. By order dated March 1, 2023, the undersigned screened the original complaint. (ECF No. 8.) The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Thereafter, plaintiff filed three amended complaints. (ECF Nos. 11, 12, 13.) Plaintiff has now filed two motions to amend the complaint. (ECF Nos. 15, 17.) Therein, it appears that plaintiff seeks to add defendants and allegations to the amended complaint. (Id.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. 27 …