Bobbla

(PC) Davis v. Bobbla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20232:22-cv-01658California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS, AKA No. 2:22-cv-1658 TLN DB P

MAURICE DARONTE DAVIS-ROGERS,

11 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

MANJALA BOBBLA,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant violated his Eighth Amendment right to adequate medical care. By order dated March 1, 2023, the undersigned screened the original complaint. (ECF No. 8.) The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend for failure to state a claim. Thereafter, plaintiff filed three amended complaints. (ECF Nos. 11, 12, 13.) Plaintiff has now filed two motions to amend the complaint. (ECF Nos. 15, 17.) Therein, it appears that plaintiff seeks to add defendants and allegations to the amended complaint. (Id.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.