Dayson

(PC) Fratus v. Dayson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20232:20-cv-00354California761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN FRATUS, No. 2:20-cv-0354 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DAYSON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges that he suffered side effects from psychiatric medication and was denied medical treatment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 87), motion for an extension of time to serve defendant Vallar (ECF No. 88), and motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 89.) Plaintiff concurrently filed a motion to stay discovery and request for a ninety-day extension of time to serve defendant Vallar. (ECF Nos. 87, 88.) Shortly thereafter, service was effected on defendant Vallar. (ECF No. 90.) Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to serve defendant Vallar will be denied as moot. Plaintiff requested that discovery deadlines by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.