Henry

(PC) Rodriguez v. Henry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20232:20-cv-01659California328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAM RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:20-CV-1659-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. HENRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion, ECF No. 34, to compel discovery responses from Plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. In their motion, Defendants state that they served written discovery consisting of interrogatories and requests for production of documents on June 17, 2022. See ECF No. 34, pgs. 3-4. As of the deadline to respond – August 4, 2022 – Defendants had not received any responses from Plaintiff to either discovery request. See id. at 4. Defendants sent Plaintiff a meet-and- confer letter on August 9, 2022. See id. As of August 30, 2022 – the date Defendants filed the instant motion to compel – Plaintiff still had not served any responses to Defendants’ discovery requests. See id. Given…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.