Madruga

(PC) Miller v. Madruga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20231:23-cv-00616California404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ROSEMARY HEATHER MILLER, 1:23-cv-00616-GSA-PC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO

Plaintiff, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS

vs. CASE

MADRUGA, et al., AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED

(ECF No. 2.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE BY MAY 26, 2023

I. FINDINGS

22 Rosemary Heather Miller (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 23 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 24 commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 26 In the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff reports that she has cash. (ECF No. 27 2 at 2 ¶ 4.) Plaintiff’s prison trust account statement shows that on April 6, 2023, she had a 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.