Madruga
(PC) Miller v. Madruga
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20231:23-cv-00616California404 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 ROSEMARY HEATHER MILLER, 1:23-cv-00616-GSA-PC
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO
Plaintiff, RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TO THIS
vs. CASE
MADRUGA, et al., AND
Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS BE DENIED
(ECF No. 2.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE BY MAY 26, 2023
I. FINDINGS
22 Rosemary Heather Miller (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 23 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 21, 2023, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 24 commencing this action, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 26 In the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff reports that she has cash. (ECF No. 27 2 at 2 ¶ 4.) Plaintiff’s prison trust account statement shows that on April 6, 2023, she had a 28 1 …