Bonta

(PS) Giannini v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20232:23-cv-00428California1,659 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC GIANNINI, No. 2:23-cv-0428 TLN DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROB BONTA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Eric Giannini is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint, motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and motions to appoint counsel. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 6.) The complaint’s allegations concern state court proceedings. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. //// //// 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.