Cittadino

Cittadino v. BrandSafway Services, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20232:23-cv-00322California1,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 9 SULLIVAN CITTADINO, No. 2:23-cv-00322 WBS JDP Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

BRANDSAFWAY SERVICES, LLC; BRAND

INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.;

BRANDSAFWAY INDUSTRIES, LLC; SAFWAY GROUP HOLDING, LLC; and 15 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants.

18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Plaintiff Sullivan Cittadino brought this action in 20 Solano County Superior Court against BrandSafway Services, LLC; 21 Brand Industrial Services, Inc.; BrandSafway Industries, LLC; and 22 Safway Group Holding, LLC (collectively “defendants”), alleging 23 breach of an implied employment contract, and violation of 24 California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 25 17200 et seq. (Compl. (Docket No. 1-1).) Defendants removed the 26 action to this court based on diversity. (Notice of Removal 27 28 (Docket No. 1).) Plaintiff now moves to remand. (Mot. (Docket No. 8).) “Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, a defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.