Kelley

(PC) Davis v. Kelley

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20232:22-cv-00773California1,271 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN DAVIS, No. 2:22-cv-0773 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER K. KELLEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that he has received inadequate medical care in violation of his rights. By order dated March 27, 2023, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s third amended complaint. (ECF No. 18.) Therein, the undersigned determined plaintiff stated a potentially cognizable deliberate indifference claim against defendant Drs. Kelley and Ashe, but did not contain any additional claims. (Id. at 6-7.) Plaintiff was given the option to proceed immediately or to file an amended complaint. (Id. at 7-9.) Plaintiff has responded by filing a motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file an amended complaint (ECF No. 19), a request for subpoenas (ECF No. 20), a motion to amend (ECF No. 21), and has returned a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.