Arauz

Arauz v. M.A.C. Cosmetics Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20232:22-cv-01663California2,896 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YILENIA ARAUZ, an individual, No. 2:22-cv-01663-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MAC COSMETICS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 17 On August 15, 2022, Plaintiff Yilenia Arauz (“Plaintiff”) filed her Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, against her former employer, Defendant MAC Cosmetics, Inc. (“Defendant”). See Ex. A, Not. Removal, ECF No. 1, at 12–45 (“Compl.”). Defendant subsequently removed the case to this Court on September 21, 2022, pursuant to this Court’s diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See Not. Removal, ECF No. 1, at 1–10 (“Not. Removal”). Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, which has been fully briefed. ECF Nos. 7 (“Pl.’s Mot.”), 9 (“Def.’s Opp’n”), 10. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.1 27 1 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.