Rosemary H. Mullins v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20231:21-cv-00405California898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSEMARY HINOJOSA MULLINS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00405-ADA-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED MOTION TO

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

v. (ECF No. 34) COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 A scheduling order for this matter issued on May 6, 2022. (ECF No. 25.) The scheduling order was modified once on February 16, 2023. (ECF No. 30.) On April 11, 2023, this action was reassigned from District Judge Anthony W. Ishii to District Judge Ana de Alba. (ECF No. 32.) On April 24, 2023, the newly assigned District Judge reset the pretrial conference and trial dates. (ECF No. 32.) Currently before the Court is the parties’ stipulation requesting the Court reset the pretrial conference and trial dates due to a scheduling conflict of counsel, as well as a request to extend the discovery deadlines. The parties propose this is an appropriate time to extend discovery given the necessity of changing the trial date, and based on the proffer that they have completed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.