Meyers

(PC) Miramontes v. Meyers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20231:23-cv-00204California1,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL MIRAMONTES, Case No. 1:23-cv-00204-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE1

OFFICER MEYERS, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD Defendant. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review. As more fully set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this case without prejudice due to Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action by keeping the Court apprised of a current address. I. FACTS AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Paul Miramontes, a state prisoner, commenced this action by filing a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Kern County Superior Court on October 18, 2022. (Doc. No. 1 at 7). On February 10, 2023, Defendant removed the case to this Court. (Id. at 1). On February 13, 2023, the undersigned issued Prisoner New Case Documents to Plaintiff. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.