(PC)Ramirez

(PC)Ramirez v. Francisco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20231:23-cv-00162California216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

een ne eee II III I IEE IE ID EINE ee 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00162-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COPIES v. (Doc. No. 9) FRANCISCO, ET AL., Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs construed motion for copies.! (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiffs 18 request for copies should be directed to the clerk’s office. Plaintiff is advised that his pro se status does 19 not entitle him to receive complimentary copies. Blair v. CDCR, 2018 WL 1959532, at *6 n.2 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 25, 2018). Consistent with statute, the clerk provides copies of documents and the docket sheet at $0.50 per page. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. Checks in the exact amount are payable to “Clerk, USDC.” Accordingly, it is ORDERED: Plaintiff’s motion for copies is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9). Dated: _ May 9.2023 Wiha Th. Doareh Hack …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.