Rexford Properties LLC v. AGCS Marine Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20231:23-cv-00276California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REXFORD PROPERTIES LLC, Case No. 1:23-cv-00276-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE

COURT TO TERMINATE ALLIANZ

v. GLOBAL CORPORATE AND SPECIALTY

AS DEFENDANT IN THIS ACTION

AGCS MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., (ECF No. 16) 15 Defendants.

17 On May 9, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 41(a) as to the dismissal of Defendant Allianz Global Corporate and Specialty. (ECF 19 No. 16.) The dismissal of this Defendant is without prejudice. (Id. at 1.) The claims against the 20 other named Defendant are not subject to the stipulation and will remain active. 21 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all of 22 the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 23 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 24 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.