Cloak

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARL DAVIS SR., Case No. 1:22-cv-01632-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

CONSTRUED MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION CLOAK, ET AL., (Doc. No. 13) Defendants. 16 On February 13, 2023, Plaintiff filed a pleading titled “Supplemental Petition” (Doc. No. 13) stating his opposition to the Court’s January 26, 2023 Order Denying Appointment of Counsel. (Doc. No. 9). Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its January 26, 2023 Order denying Plaintiff appointment of counsel because, inter alia, he is indigent, he has difficulty accessing legal materials, and his on-call work as a wildland firefighter leaves him little time to litigate his case. (Doc. No. 13 at 1). The Court construes the motion as filed under Rule 60(b). Rule 60(b) provides relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable…