Alo

Alo v. Goldsmith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 10, 20231:23-cv-00536California9,119 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALCAPONE ALO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00536-SAB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

CAROLE GOLDSMITH, et al., (ECF No. 1)

Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

16 Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on April 6, 2023. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by prisoners); Calhoun …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.