Alo
Alo v. Goldsmith
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALCAPONE ALO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00536-SAB
Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST
v. AMENDED COMPLAINT
CAROLE GOLDSMITH, et al., (ECF No. 1)
Defendants. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
16 Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on April 6, 2023. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by prisoners); Calhoun …