(PC) Spearman v. Department of State Hospitals

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD EDWARD SPEARMAN, No. 2:21-cv-01213-TLN-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Reginald Edward Spearman’s (“Plaintiff”) Motions to Reopen the Case. (ECF Nos. 22, 23.) No opposition has been filed. On June 8, 2022, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 19.) The magistrate judge noted that although Plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, Plaintiff was properly served pursuant to Local Rule 182(f) as “it is [P]laintiff’s responsibility to keep the [C]ourt apprised of his current address at all times.” (Id.) This Court adopted the findings and recommendations in full and dismissed the action without prejudice on July 25, 2022. (ECF No. 20.) /// 28 …