Humphey
(PC) Cunningham v. Humphey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00564-SAB (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION
P. HUMPHEY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
(ECF No. 9)
16 Plaintiff L.C. Cunningham is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 26, 2023, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, and found that he stated a cognizable a cognizable failure to protect claim against Defendants Lascina and Murphy. (ECF No. 8.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other cognizable claims. Plaintiff was granted the opportunity to file an amended complaint or notify the Court of his intent to proceed on the claims found to be cognizable. (Id.) On May 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a…