Cox
(PC) Bailey v. Cox
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT, WITHOUT v. PREJUDICE
T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 34)
11 Defendants.
13 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend, filed May 9, 2023. Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint to allege his prayer for relief. (ECF No. 34.) Defendants have not yet filed an answer to the complaint. Accordingly, the motion is deemed submitted. Local Rule 230(l). Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served. Otherwise, a party may amend only by leave of the…