Humphey

(PC) Cunningham v. Humphey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20231:23-cv-00564California1,461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00564-ADA-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED

P. HUMPHEY, et al.,

(ECF No. 10) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff L.C. Cunningham is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction, filed May 8, 2023. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 governs injunctions and restraining orders, and requires that a motion for temporary restraining order include “specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint [that] clearly show that immediate, and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.