Adams

Adams v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20232:22-cv-01499California1,298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 KATE ADAMS, No. 2:22-cv-01499 WBS KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL1

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political subdivision of the state of California; SHERIFF SCOTT JONES in his individual and official capacity as Sheriff of the County of Sacramento, and DOES 1-10, Defendants. 20 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff moves for certification of the court’s March 27, 2023 Order (Docket No. 32) for interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). (Docket No. 37.) Defendants do not oppose the motion. (Docket No. 38.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), a district court may certify 27 The court takes this motion under submission on the papers, without oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). for appeal an interlocutory order which is not otherwise appealable if the district court is “of the opinion that such 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.