Moose Hills, LLC v. Enel Kansas, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOOSE HILLS, LLC, No. 2:22-cv-01488 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ENEL KANSAS, LCC and ENEL

SURPRISE VALLEY, LLC,

15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff improperly included a substantive memorandum in the noticed motion, and defendant filed an ex parte application to file a separate response (ECF No. 17), but the parties ultimately complied with the Local Rules and filed a joint statement at ECF No. 19. Only the joint statement and accompanying exhibits have been considered. The ex parte application (ECF No. 17) is therefore DENIED as MOOT. The motion to compel was submitted on the papers. ECF No. 16. Based on a review of all documents and argument presented, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and ORDERS defendant to turn over all non-privileged documents responsive to plaintiff’s Requests for Production 4, 5, and 7 to plaintiffs within ten (10) days of this…