Wilson

Wilson v. Timec Services Co.,.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20232:23-cv-00172California6,646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 MARVONTE WILSON and DOMONIQUE No. 2:23-cv-00172 WBS KJN DANIELS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: Plaintiffs, DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 15 v.

TIMEC SERVICES COMPANY, INC.;

FERROVIAL SERVICES

INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.; VALERO

REFINING COMPANY-CALIFORNIA; DISA GLOBAL SOLUTIONS; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 21 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiffs Marvonte Wilson and Domonique Daniels brought this putative class action in Solano County Superior Court against Timec Services Company, Inc. (“Timec”); Ferrovial Services Infrastructure, Inc. (“Ferrovial”); Valero Refining Company-California (“Valero”); and DISA Global Solutions (“DISA”). Plaintiffs allege employment discrimination based on race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and the California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.