(HC) Anderson v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 15, 20232:23-cv-00522California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DION ANDERSON, and KONANYAH No. 2:23-cv-0522 WBS KJN P

BN YAHLAZAR,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On March 17, 2023, plaintiff filed a “Request and Notice for Removal to the Eastern District,” under 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Plaintiff sought removal of his petition for writ of mandate filed in state court. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On May 1, 2023, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Plaintiff’s Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” However, plaintiff does not object, but rather concedes that only defendants 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.