Muehlemann

Muehlemann v. Adventist Health Hanford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20231:23-cv-00728California661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL EDWARD MUEHLEMANN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00728-ADA-EPG et al., ORDER (1) REQUIRING EACH PLAINTIFF Plaintiff, TO SUBMIT AN IFP APPLICATION AND (2) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO v. SEND PLAINTIFFS IFP FORMS 13 ADVENTIST HEALTH HANFORD, (ECF No. 2) 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiffs Michael Edward Muehlemann and Lavonda Louise Ireland, proceeding pro se, 17 filed this lawsuit on May 11, 2023. (ECF No. 1). On the same day, Plaintiffs filed an application 18 to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (ECF No. 2). Because there are two main deficiencies with 19 the IFP application, the Court will direct each Plaintiff to file a new and separate application. 20 First, while the application appears to be signed by both Plaintiffs, it only contains 21 Plaintiff Muehlemann’s financial information. (ECF No. 2). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a pro 22 se plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees by submitting “an affidavit that includes a 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.