(PC) Harding v. Correctional Health Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20232:21-cv-00922California2,499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT LEE HARDING, No. 2:21-cv-00922 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

GLADYS MENCIAS, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county detainee1 and current state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendant has denied him adequate medical care, in violation of his constitutional rights. Before the court are plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 16) and defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 18), which the court granted on December 28, 2021. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel will be denied without prejudice and the undersigned will recommend defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status be granted. ////

1 Plaintiff states that he was arrested and detained at the Sacramento County Jail on March 17, 2021, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.