Mollica

Mollica v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 16, 20232:19-cv-02017California12,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lia D. Mollica, No. 2:19-cv-02017-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Lia Mollica brings this action against Sacramento County and its employees for 18 injuries she sustained while incarcerated in the County’s jail. Defendants move for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs claims. For the reasons below the court grants the motion in part and denies the motion in part. I. EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS Defendants object to plaintiff's evidence. Objs., ECF No. 85-3. Without providing any 23 explanation, defendants make broad generalized objections on grounds of hearsay, lacking 24 foundation, authentication or personal knowledge, and relevancy. See generally id. The court 25 finds these objections lack merit. As to relevancy, the court does not rely on irrelevant evidence when considering motions for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.