Cuisnot

(PC) Hatton v. Cuisnot

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20232:23-cv-00020California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Sr., Case No. 2:23-cv-00020-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KIMBERLY CUISNOT, et al., Defendants. 16 On March 7, 2023, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing 17 fee or an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 4. I also warned him that failure to 18 respond to the order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id at 1-2. 19 To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required filing fee nor otherwise responded to the March 7 20 order. 21 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a 22 United States District Judge to this case. 23 Further, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure 24 to pay the required filing fee and failure to comply with court orders. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.