CDCR

(PC) Ripple v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 17, 20231:22-cv-01102California2,852 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LORRAINE RIPPLE, Case No. 1:22-cv-01102-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND v. (Doc. No. 20) CDCR, ET AL., AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CASE1

Defendants. (Doc. No. 22)

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 22, “FAC”). Also pending is Plaintiff’s Motion to Correct First Amended Complaint, which the Court construes as a Motion to Amend. (Doc. No. 22). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned grants the motion to amend, and issues these Amended Findings and Recommendations recommending the district court dismiss the FAC under § 1915A for failure to state a claim. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF OPERATIVE PLEADING A. Procedural History Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights 27 1This matter was referred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.