Sampson

Sampson v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20232:23-cv-00036California1,816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK SAMPSON SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff(s) v. Case No.: 2:23-cv-00036 DJC KJN WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. Defendant(s) 16 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. No further service is permitted without leave of the Court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES / AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted after 6/30/2023 without leave of the Court, good cause having been shown. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 27 604 (9th Cir. 1992). III. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Discovery matters that do not implicate the schedule of the case or that do not relate to sealing or redaction of documents related to dispositive motions are referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, who will hear all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.