Tanzy
Tanzy v. Yaylaci
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INGRAM TANZY, Case No. 1:21-cv-01187-JLT-CDB
Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE
v. IMPOSED FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE
TO COMPLY AND FAILURE TO
BAHRI YAYLACI, et al., PROSECUTE
Defendants. SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE
(Doc. 14)
On April 25, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff’s motion to set aside dismissal and judgment (the Order) and reopened this case. (Doc. 14). The Order directed Plaintiff to file proof of service within 20 days of the order (id. at p. 3), e.g., on or before May 15, 2023. Plaintiff filed a belated return of service for Defendant Yaylaci on May 17, 2023. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff has yet to serve Defendant Long Island Freight Corp. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 26 …