Tanzy

Tanzy v. Yaylaci

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20231:21-cv-01187California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INGRAM TANZY, Case No. 1:21-cv-01187-JLT-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

v. IMPOSED FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE

TO COMPLY AND FAILURE TO

BAHRI YAYLACI, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE

(Doc. 14)

On April 25, 2023, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff’s motion to set aside dismissal and judgment (the Order) and reopened this case. (Doc. 14). The Order directed Plaintiff to file proof of service within 20 days of the order (id. at p. 3), e.g., on or before May 15, 2023. Plaintiff filed a belated return of service for Defendant Yaylaci on May 17, 2023. (Doc. 15). Plaintiff has yet to serve Defendant Long Island Freight Corp. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.