Jackson v. Fastenal Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 18, 20231:20-cv-00345California9,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIESHIA MARIE JACKSON, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-00345-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. IN PART FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS

ACTION SETTLEMENT AND MOTION

FASTENAL COMPANY, FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

Defendant. (ECF Nos. 26, 27, 29, 33, 35)

14 Plaintiff Mieshia Marie Jackson brings this action on behalf of herself and others similarly situated against Defendant Fastenal Company, alleging various wage and hour violations under California state law. (ECF No. 1-1.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for final approval of the class action settlement and motion for attorneys’ fees. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.) On October 13, 2022, the parties appeared before the Court for the hearing on the motions by videoconference. (ECF No. 28.) Attorney Avi Kreitenberg appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs; attorney Melis Atalay appeared for Defendant. No other appearances were made on this matter and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.