Hellman

Hellman v. Polaris Industries, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20232:21-cv-00949California300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Francisco Berlanga, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-00949-KJM-DMC Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Polaris Industries, Inc., et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiffs and defendants jointly filed a renewed request to redact, in part, two documents 17 related to plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Notice of Mot., ECF No. 83; Joint Request at 5.! The court has previously discussed the applicable legal standard and incorporates it by 19 reference in this order. See Prior Order (Apr. 28, 2023) at 1-2, ECF No. 77. The court finds the parties’ request now satisfies the “compelling reason” standard necessary for redaction and sealing, Kamakana v. City of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006), because the information to be redacted contains “product development plans” and other 23 confidential information, which could be used by “competitors seeking to replicate [products] and 24 circumvent the time and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.