Hudson

(PC) Springfield v. Hudson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20232:22-cv-00328California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, No. 2:22-cv-0328 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS P. HUDSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a “temporary restraining order” and an amended motion for a “temporary restraining order” which are more properly construed as motions for preliminary injunctive relief. The court considers the motions together. First, plaintiff is not clear as to the relief sought. He complains about conditions of confinement but is not clear which specific conditions this court should order changed. Second, as plaintiff has already been informed on three separate occasions (ECF No. 19, 23 & 24), plaintiff does not state a claim for injunctive relief in the operative second amended complaint, so the court cannot grant preliminary injunctive relief. For these reasons, the court will recommend that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied. If…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.