Cooper

(PC) Latifi v. Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20232:23-cv-00665California1,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAREEM LATIFI, No. 2: 23-cv-0665 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JIM COOPER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Named as defendants are Sacramento County Sheriff Cooper, Food Service Supervisor Johnson and Dr. Singh. Plaintiff’s amended complaint raises two claims. At the outset, the undersigned observes that the amended complaint contains no allegations against defendant Cooper. The Civil Rights Act under which this action was filed provides as follows: Every person who, under color of [state law] . . . subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States . . . to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution . . . shall be liable to the party injured in an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.