(PC) Flowers v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20231:19-cv-01027California395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL DE’ANDRAE FLOWERS, Case No. 1:19-cv-01027-JLT-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT TOON, (Doc. 83) Defendant.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Michael De’Andrae Flowers is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 5, 2023, Defendant Zachary Toon filed a motion for summary judgment., which includes a notice of the motion and a warning as required by Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1988) (en banc), informing Plaintiff of the requirements of Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docs. 83, 83- 3.) Local Rule 260(b) also sets forth the procedure for opposing the Defendant’s version of the facts: Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.