Pheiffer

(PC) Singh v. Pheiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20231:22-cv-01412California1,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01412-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED,

13 v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND COMPLY WITH A

14 WARDEN PHEIFFER, et al., COURT ORDER 15 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN DAYS

17 Michael Manjeet Singh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 9). On April 3, 2023, the Court 19 screened Plaintiff’s complaint, concluding that Plaintiff’s complaint states cognizable claims 20 against Defendants Veith, Fowler, and Diaz and fails to state cognizable claims against the 21 remaining Defendants named in Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 28). The screening order directed 22 Plaintiff to either file a First Amended Complaint, notify the Court that he wished to proceed only 23 on his claims against Defendants Veith, Fowler, and Diaz, or notify the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.