(PS) Bernhard v. County of San Joaquin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20232:21-cv-00948California493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LLOYD THOMAS BERNARD, II; No. 2:21-cv-00948 TLN DB PS

STEPHANIE CELESTE TEJADA-

OTERO, Plaintiffs, ORDER AND

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Lloyd Thomas Bernard and Stephanie Celeste Tejada-Otero are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On December 23, 2022, the undersigned dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint and granted plaintiffs leave to amend and to properly serve the defendants. (ECF No. 22.) On January 19, 2023, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking a 45-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 23.) On March 8, 2023, the undersigned granted plaintiffs’ request and ordered plaintiffs to file an amended complaint within 28 days. (ECF No. 25.) The twenty-eight-day period has expired, and plaintiffs have not responded to the court’s order in any manner.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.