Diaz

(PC) Lake v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20232:21-cv-00395California284 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN LAKE, No. 2:21-cv-0395 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 On November 6, 2022, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and he was given thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 6. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, nor has he responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Judge to this case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.