Humphey

(PC) Cunningham v. Humphey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20231:23-cv-00564California1,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 L. C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:23-cv-00564-ADA-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED

P. HUMPHEY, et al.,

(ECF No. 14) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff L.C. Cunningham is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 22, 2023, Plaintiff filed an “affidavit” in which he claims that staff and inmates have been “taunting” him. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff also contends that he is constantly being retaliated against because of his civil rights complaint filings. The Court construes Plaintiff’s “affidavit” as a request for injunctive relief. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 governs injunctions and restraining orders, and requires that a motion for temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.