CDCR

(PC) Mendez v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 23, 20232:22-cv-01339California306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMON EDDIE MENDEZ, No. 2:22-cv-1339 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed January 26, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On February 8, 2023, the order was re-served on plaintiff’s new address. Thirty days from that date have passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

Plaintiff’s copy of the order was not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.