Better Meat Co. v. Emergy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 22, 20232:21-cv-02338California489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THE BETTER MEAT CO., No. 2:21-cv-02338-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. EMERGY, Inc. d/b/a MEATI FOODS, PAUL WRONSKY, and BOND CAPITAL

MANAGEMENT LP.,

16 Defendants. 17 EMERGY, INC. d/b/a MEATI FOODS, 18 Counter Claimant, 19 v. THE BETTER MEAT CO. and AUGUSTUS

PATTILLO,

22 Counter Defendants. 23 24 On April 17, 2023 this court granted defendant/counter claimant Emergy’s motion to 26 strike under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. Prior Order (Apr. 17, 2023), ECF No. 134. Emergy 27 then moved for attorneys’ fees and costs related to this motion. Mot. for Fees, ECF No. 136. In 28 response, plaintiff/counter defendant Better Meat filed a motion for administrative relief, asking

the court to stay the briefing and hearing of Emergy’s motion “until after entry of a final judgment.” Mot. for Admin. Relief at 2, ECF No. 137. This court’s standing order requires attorneys to meet and confer with one another before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.