Warden

(HC) Abdul Basit Jahangir v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 19, 20231:23-cv-00219California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ABDUL BASIT JAHANGIR, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-0219 JLT HBK (HC) ) Petitioner, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING v. ) PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, ) AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO WARDEN, ) CLOSE CASE ) Respondent. ) (Docs. 1, 11) ) ) The assigned magistrate judge reviewed the petition in this case and found it failed to comply with Local Rule 131(b) and Rule 2 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, because it was not signed under penalty of perjury. The magistrate judge granted Petitioner the opportunity to cure this deficiency and directed Petitioner to respond within 21 days. (Doc. 2.) Petitioner failed to respond. The magistrate judge then found that Petitioner failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the Court’s order, and recommended the petition be dismissed. (Doc. 11.) The Court served the Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.