(PC) Suarez v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20231:22-cv-00160California1,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE ALFREDO SUAREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00160-JLT-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO COMPEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS

v. PREMATURE

KEN CLARK, et al., (ECF No. 51) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Jose Alfredo Suarez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed May 23, 2023. Although the time to file a response has not passed, the Court finds a response is not necessary and deems Plaintiff’s motion submitted. II. LEGAL STANDRD Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and he is a state prisoner challenging his conditions of confinement. As a result, the parties were relieved of some of the requirements which would otherwise apply, including initial disclosure and the need to meet and confer in good faith prior to involving the Court in a discovery dispute.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.