Craven

(PC) Develter v. Craven

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20232:22-cv-01389California340 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARL WILLIAM DEVELTER, No. 2:22-cv-1389 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER & FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

CRAVEN, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed March 20, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 20, 2023, 2023, the order was re-served on plaintiff. Thirty days from that date have expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copies of the order were returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.