(PC)Facundo

(PC)Facundo v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20231:22-cv-00285California347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE FACUNDO, Case No. 1:22-cv-0285 JLT SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDERS AND

HILL, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. 12)

16 Joe Facundo seeks to hold the defendants liable for civil rights violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Because Plaintiff failed to obey the Court’s order and failed to prosecute this action, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 12.) at 4.) These Findings and Recommendations were served by mail on May 1, 2023. They informed Plaintiff that any objections were due within 14 days of the date of service. (Id.) In addition, the Court advised Plaintiff that the “failure to file objections within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.