Davis

Davis v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 24, 20231:22-cv-01381California650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT DONALD DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01381-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY

v. OBLIGATIONS

WALMART INC. et al., (Doc. 27)

Defendant.

16 On May 11, 2023, the Court received an email request from counsel for Defendant to convene a conference with the parties because counsel for Plaintiff reportedly had completely failed to respond to Defendant’s written discovery demands. Counsel for Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s email inquiry by stating, “we are continuing to work on responses. We will work to get these to you in the next 7 to 8 days.” Thereafter, on May 15, 2023, Defendant filed a “Statement re: Discovery Disagreement” in which it requested a Court conference to resolve the parties’ discovery disputes. (Doc. 24). The Court scheduled a status conference and ordered Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant’s report of the discovery disputes. (Doc. 25). Plaintiff 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.