Kisaberth

Kisaberth v. Expedia, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 25, 20231:22-cv-01562California543 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUE KISABERTH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01562-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION

TO REMAND

v. (Doc. 13) EXPEDIA INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed her original Complaint in the Superior Court of Madera County, California, on October 6, 2022. (Doc. 1 at 9.) At that time, the named Defendants were Expedia, Inc., and VRBO. (Id.) Defendant Expedia, Inc. removed the case from state court based on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1441(b). (Doc. 1.) On February 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 7) and a concurrent Motion to Dismiss the originally named corporate Defendants (Doc. 6). On February 22, 2023, this Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend and denied as moot the motion to dismiss the corporate Defendants. (Doc. 10.) The Plaintiff filed her First Amended Complaint, which names only two individual defendants, Shad Schidel, and Stephanie Schidel, both of whom are alleged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.