Sherman

(PC) Sharpe v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 30, 20231:19-cv-00711California1,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM SHARPE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00711-ADA-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMBINED MOTION TO SUPPRESS

EVIDENCE, MOTION TO COMPEL, AND

C. CRYER, et al., MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Defendants. (ECF No. 140)

15 16 Plaintiff Adam Sharpe is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s combined motion to suppress evidence, motion to compel, and motion for sanctions. (ECF No. 140). For the reasons given below, the Court will deny the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on May 21, 2019, alleging deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment to his serious medical need for specialized contact lenses that help with his eye condition, Keratoconus. Pertinent here, after screening, the case proceeded on Plaintiff’s deliberate indifference claims against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.